As part of my continuing reflection on the Parkland shooting, I wanted to share this moving video of a Parkland student speaking in a listening session with the president, who was holding notes to help him respond with seeming empathy. I continue to react with awe to the voices and activism of the Parkland students and the other teens who have mobilized to demand that lawmakers and other authorities take steps to help protect students and the general public from gun violence.
While many people are advancing serious strategies, others have responded with suggestions that are problematic. The president and some others are promoting the idea of arming teachers, which is opposed by teachers’ organizations and many individual teachers, parents, school board and community members. There was an armed police officer on duty at the high school in Parkland, but he, despite his training and experience, did not intervene in the shooting and has since resigned. How could teachers, with much lower levels of training and experience, ever hope to wound or kill an armed intruder without shooting bystanders? How many accidental discharges or mistakes would there be if 20% of all teachers were armed? In other countries that have suffered a mass shooting and taken effective action, the solution has always been to reduce the firepower in civilian hands, not increase it.
I am also appalled to report that the member of the House of Representatives from my district, Claudia Tenney, has made a number of reprehensible remarks after Parkland, most notably that “so many of these people that commit the mass murders wind up being Democrats.” (There is no data to back up this claim.)
I find this particularly offensive to those of us who live in the Binghamton area. When the mass shooting at the American Civic Association here occurred in 2009, it did not matter whether the shooter was a Republican, Democrat, independent, or not a voter at all. What mattered was that people were killed and wounded, families and communities shattered, and a beloved civic institution damaged. That Representative Tenney could be so dismissive of those of us in the southern part of her district as she vociferously supports a gun manufacturer nearer to where she lives is ye another reason that many of us have already mobilized to hold her to account for her views and votes and to back strong candidates to oppose her in the November election. We deserve a representative who is thoughtful, honest, and committed to the common good.
Excellent post, Joanne. One thing that always impresses me is how well you communicate with dignity on difficult, emotional subjects. Claudia Tenney seems to be following the president’s example of making reprehensible remarks. We deserve better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, JoAnna. I endeavor to write from my grounding in Catholic social justice doctrine, which recognizes the dignity of each person – in secular terms, humanism. I’m gratified that that comes through in my writing.
It is so discouraging to listen to our representative being so divisive and demeaning. She won in a three way race in 2016 and we are hoping to elect a replacement who will better reflect our values in Washington.
LikeLike
Those three way races can sure complicate things.
LikeLike
Yes. The person I supported was from my town. She has experience with school board and county legislature and is well known here as a businessperson and philanthropist. She would have been excellent in Congress.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe she will be some day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps, although she is not running this year.
LikeLike